Commentary on Philemon

Theodore of Mopsuestia (350–428)

The wearing of such chains would be a vile thing only if Paul refused them out of lack of concern for the salvation of others.

Paul makes a point of greeting Philemon and Apphia equally. He wishes to indicate thereby that in no way is there a difference of faith or strength of faith between men and women.

Archippus was their son.

While keeping the social order here, Paul does not call some indiscriminate multitude "the church," but only those who are bound together in faith. This bond sets the frame for Paul's appeal in the letter.

Paul shows here what power his name alone has.

Now Paul uses the name of Onesimus, but only after signaling the profound change that has occurred [i.e., Onesimus's conversion].

Paul indicates that had he kept Onesimus, the result would have been that he could serve Paul as an extension of Philemon's service and thus have been a source of gain for Philemon.

Clearly Onesimus's flight has served to reverse the wickedness of his judgment. The "perhaps," however, makes Paul more persuasive [i.e., Paul puts this thought forward as a consideration for Philemon].

See also

• More works by Theodore of Mopsuestia

Enable JavaScript to read the full text and search the library.